Internet and Democracy (Revised version)
Wikipedia told me that democracy can assume many different forms around the globe. However, at first the very word democracy brings to mind ideas of equality and freedom. What does the internet mean as far these notions of freedom and equality are concerned? Is it in anyway enhancing or eroding these values?
To begin with consider this blog. The very fact that I am able to express my views freely and that these views are accessible by you, the reader, implies that the internet promotes the freedom of thought, speech and expression. It is so vast that there appears to be infinite “virtual” space for everyone to speak out and be heard. However, in a democracy, the regulation of piracy and the implementation of copyright laws are important. The recent debates over file sharing software and the digitizing of libraries lead us to believe that the internet is still grappling with the implementation of anti-piracy and copyright laws. In my opinion the main “problem” with the internet is the fact that it is still evolving. For instance, in the physical world social norms, defining the “acceptable”, give the boundaries within which people can exercise their freedom of speech and expression. Since such norms are still being developed in cyberspace, to some extent we are safe in assuming that these freedoms can be misused in the virtual world.
The internet promotes equality because it does not discriminate between users while providing information. All internet users have equal opportunity to be both creators and consumers of information. Bimber’s research indicates that the internet brings down barriers related to the availability of resources and organizations with different levels of funding can compete with one another. Nevertheless, the emerging digital divide is causing yet another chasm between people. As Bimber pointed out, while referring to the use of internet by political parties during elections, cyberspace leads to differences among the more and the less engaged people. I’m not certain though whether in democracy, citizens should be equal in terms of the knowledge they possess. With the world now recognizing knowledge as capital, I wonder whether democracies should strive to provide equal access to knowledge among its citizens. The internet plays a dual role in this respect.
As the readings suggest the internet can be used effectively to enhance participation in the government, through online voting, discussion forums, online opinion polls etc. This is the most important democratic value that the internet best promotes. With website like meetup.com, the freedom of association is better utilized as they bring people with similar beliefs together.
I believe that the internet is a very effective tool that can be used to promote democratic values. However, it needs to evolve further in order to overcome the shortcomings.
To begin with consider this blog. The very fact that I am able to express my views freely and that these views are accessible by you, the reader, implies that the internet promotes the freedom of thought, speech and expression. It is so vast that there appears to be infinite “virtual” space for everyone to speak out and be heard. However, in a democracy, the regulation of piracy and the implementation of copyright laws are important. The recent debates over file sharing software and the digitizing of libraries lead us to believe that the internet is still grappling with the implementation of anti-piracy and copyright laws. In my opinion the main “problem” with the internet is the fact that it is still evolving. For instance, in the physical world social norms, defining the “acceptable”, give the boundaries within which people can exercise their freedom of speech and expression. Since such norms are still being developed in cyberspace, to some extent we are safe in assuming that these freedoms can be misused in the virtual world.
The internet promotes equality because it does not discriminate between users while providing information. All internet users have equal opportunity to be both creators and consumers of information. Bimber’s research indicates that the internet brings down barriers related to the availability of resources and organizations with different levels of funding can compete with one another. Nevertheless, the emerging digital divide is causing yet another chasm between people. As Bimber pointed out, while referring to the use of internet by political parties during elections, cyberspace leads to differences among the more and the less engaged people. I’m not certain though whether in democracy, citizens should be equal in terms of the knowledge they possess. With the world now recognizing knowledge as capital, I wonder whether democracies should strive to provide equal access to knowledge among its citizens. The internet plays a dual role in this respect.
As the readings suggest the internet can be used effectively to enhance participation in the government, through online voting, discussion forums, online opinion polls etc. This is the most important democratic value that the internet best promotes. With website like meetup.com, the freedom of association is better utilized as they bring people with similar beliefs together.
I believe that the internet is a very effective tool that can be used to promote democratic values. However, it needs to evolve further in order to overcome the shortcomings.
